May 2019

www.smartmachinesandfactories.com May 2019 | 0 5 | | NEWS | some adjustment to the current trial specifications to make it properly effective for those workers who need that help. She said: “Currently the scheme is being aimed at those employees whose jobs are at risk of being displaced as a result of AI and digitisation within their companies. But it fails to look at the fact that most companies want to retain their workers by up-skilling them to fill new jobs digital technologies will create or place these employees in other parts of the business.  This is the missing link in funding support and provision which the Government’s Scheme could help to fix. “The cost of retraining and up-skilling a manufacturer can be high, and the National Retraining Scheme, when it is properly rolled out across the country, needs to be more widely available including those employers who wish to up-skill their current workers as well as for those employees who do find themselves in a position where they are looking for alternative employment.” Key findings from Make UK research includes: Almost a third (31%) of manufacturers expect some job losses in lower level roles due to technological change in the next 5 years This reduces to 22% for mid-skilled roles and 12% for higher-skilled roles suggesting that where manufacturers are investing in 4IR it tends to be lower level roles where it will be tasks and processes, as opposed to jobs that will change. Manufacturers want to retain employees whose jobs are at risk – 58% plan to re-skill them to work in other parts of the business and 54% plan to up-skill them to work in new job roles that investment in digital technologies and techniques will create . There is a potential role for the Government’s National Retraining Scheme as a quarter (24%) of companies will be looking for external support. Manufacturers are thinking about their training spend in light of these changes. Even looking to the year again manufacturers are planning to spend their training budgets on technical engineering skills (68%) and productivity skills (57%). However only one in five (21%) of manufacturers are looking to spend any of their training spend on digital skills. ■ D , ■ D ■ D 0 0 1 Robotics L RoboticsbyPilz W web10980 Services We're ther ilz services thr Webcode: ZHE r • y S 1 = eversible injury) S 2 = eversible injur • F –Fr xposure t d F 1 = Seldom t eoft xposur t F 2 = Frequent t xposur • P –P d P 1 = P P 2 = Scar • enceof ahazar obability can r r Required per (PL r ) Low risk High risk Star for risk r e in d Per PFH D 3 years 10 years 30 years 100 years r *InC D up t Cat.3 DC avg = low Cat. 4* DC avg CDC avg =med. Cat. 2 DC avg Cat.2 DC = low Cat.1 DC avg Cat.B DC avg = none -4 a 10 -5 b 3×10 -6 c 10 -6 d 10 -7 e 10 -8 • Category (Cat.) relatedpar ol system in r r al arr ts, fault det r • Collabor W - guar e the r form pr ation • ailure (CCF) F edue t cause • DC avg Aver age • det atioof the failure rat ected dangerous failur e rateof t ous failures • Fault State of an it acterized oper equired x eventivemaint to lackof ext esources • P is used • D Average time t ous e • Per evel (PL) Discret o specify the elatedparts of control syst operform for • Per evel, required (PL r ) Per or o achieve the r ed risk r function • PFH D Probability ofdangerous failure • ator and r operator’ t is ed interfering cont r • Risk obability of occurr • Designat ement • elated contr Contr ed int ended t machineor topr immediate incr • Safety-relat tof ol syst Par ol syst r o safety-relat ates safety- relat • F e can result in an immediat easeof the risk(s) • eA e hardness is a cor es the hardness of themat e scale ranges fr e to eeof hardness. • SRECS olSystem • ator and r ator etreat • Validation ovisionof a cer e stating special requir ended use are met • V andbypr tificate equirements of the met Themeasur ended topr and corr ectives ar cuits.As a r e information. Yes No No Yes No Yes ence near a robot’ • Ther int Human and r opped.While the r er is not pr • dancewith its int e is ar Human and r • and r ation: • y. ence ar Safety-relat op ated ored stop On entry into the collabor the r o a safeoper st ation obot r aut isdet ding t assessment. stationary r ationof the obot canbe educed accor ation oring Prot epositioned in oach the r Separ obot ismonitor ed accordingly obot switches o› obot is e compliedwith. Tr ea (body r ea pr e 2 ) force (N) pressure 2 ) force (N) forehead 1 ehead 130 130 130 2 T 110 Face 3 orymuscle 110 65 110 65 Neck 4 Neckmuscle 140 150 280 300 5 7 th neck vertebra 210 420 shoulders 6 210 320 7 5 th tebra 210 420 8 St 120 140 240 280 9 Pector 170 340 Abdomen 10 140 110 280 220 Pelvis 11 Pelvicbone 210 180 420 360 Upper arms 12 Delt 190 150 300 13 Humerus 220 440 Lower arms andwrist joints 14 Radialbone 190 160 380 320 15 Forearmmuscle 180 360 16 180 360 fingers 17 For 300 140 600 280 18 For 270 540 19 For 280 560 20 For 220 440 21 200 400 22 PalmD 260 520 23 PalmND 260 520 24 400 25 190 380 knees 26 250 220 500 440 27 220 440 L 28 220 130 440 260 29 Calfmuscle 210 420 ceandpressur Handguiding Speed and separ oring P Forceorpr e T Tr egion egion egion for for essure egion for for essure essure curve F T ,p T transient value F S ,p S 0.5 s equir obot syst egr accor T per equir atedherearepr Cat yB,1 Cat y 4 Categor OSSD1 OSSD2 Category 3 - Yes Body region erials forpr e inaccor DGUV eA) dance S 15066 2 ) ehead 70 150 Face 75 75 50 L 40 Chest 25 Pelvis 25 Lower legs 30 60 50 35 30 10 10 Acc. t r dCat. 3 Ser robot syst Pilz is here t elevant standar ectives: fr ategy t tr Tr T y s t e I p e m i We review your r dancewith the applicable ds anddir the e ds. Syst egration The r nd safety concept are implement o suit the par equirements thr select es. Int We ensur equir azil, K orea,GOS Safetydesign y pr ectivemeasures r V Our expert specialist sta› r isk and perform collision measur S 15066. Tr echnical support Our tr t pr xpertise r t obots.Our technical support t ed round the clock. Safety concept W r onic and or es. 1 2 3 6 8 9 10 11 16 21 23 18 22 17 26 27 28 4 5 7 12 13 15 14 25 20 24 19 29 4 3 2 1 2017-10, inGermany© GmbH&Co.KG, r e e cient the work becomes, o work e able t and machine ar ds y 66 CE m he er 80 uk em • • • • • • • omation of your r aut ilz is your per P e fe s tion with leading ation obot collabor -r the formulation of standar ems and sensors st obot safet ements of r equir r 5066 limit values dance ement in accor ur S 150 O 10218-2 and ISO/T ds s compliant with standar o risk assessment and is t o em, fr obot syst ycle of a r o t ed t e tailor vices that ar er obot application: tner for the safe ct par . ety eat however this places gr Collabor er ab post e‘ve pr W V and ent e for ation... out Safe Human-Robot oduced a Whit fr eam can be contact aining courses impar ernationalCompliance em int o n a t n t e m l m Risk assessment em ND=non-dominant (N/cm -FBHM-080 ement measur D=dominant Dampingmat S alidation safety funtion ems c c c syst aulic/ cydr ctron gram al c pneum onic/pr c ccal/ec Lifecycle letr a V EN IS ri O13849-1 o ni mab i/h leele ableforelet Maximum actual o ISO/TS 15066 m Maximum actual Exp onson theoptions for risk r 4 ti/meha dancewith ISO/TS 15066 ementof for Biomechanical li it values fr Masticat m PS (N/cm permissible Maximum permissible permissible Maximum Maximum PS (N/cm permissible Maximum (impact) (clamping) ce limiting monit Method3 – speedand separ Method 2 –handguiding 15066 ance - an /TS ation inaccor obot collabor Method 1 – safety-r monit eduction Thecombinationof variousmethods ispossible, such as thecombinationofmethod3and 4. p n tio(HRC) o llabora obot? ation ation cooper allel ation cooper xist ation ation cooper allel ation xist wor smuaneously? obot o contactbeeen human and r epoints tw e ther - ation or ea orsation? shar oo an human wkt ansient contact (impact) em (SRP/CS) MTTF ? cevedPL≥ formance level egoriesDC,MTTF 13849-1 ISO EN with dance (PL) evel L formance per our –comparisonPL/SIL ous failur obabilityofadanger h Det . afeHRC. eat e.And omat eaut formance level ) formance level (PL P P Do rbt d wecr ionofthe Ar obot? o uman and r k i lt Dh equena cooper r Reducingriskinhuman Methodsofhuman-r Method 4 –powerand for f typ olla erminat eofc b eS Ahi PL MTTF MTTF .co.uk ebcode 109 W ering visiting pilz.co . e by ... download th aper and a e P W MTTF Coe S ti l P Collabor botco Coe Sequential P Collabor 1 4 3 1 3 4 3 2 4 Hand-guided r lanati d withENISO102182 dISO Method4 ime Measur AnnexGEN ISO 10218-2 4 li ti l i 1 2 3 4 Middleof for Middle of shin o